Subject	>>>
Posted by	ztunerz on February 15, 2006 at 6:03 PM
	This message has been viewed 102 times.
In Reply To	a quick question about this.... posted by joker_20_02 (Rebuilding) on February 15, 2006 at 04:25 PM
Message	a dry shot is better than a wet shot injected before the TB.Fuel distribution is inherently uneven if injected b4 TB. A direct port setup is the best IMO. JWT switches between 2 programs . 1 program is activated when you use NOS. It uses the injectors to spray the additional fuel. IMO it works flawlessly as a turbo spoolup system but the cost vs performance benifit isn't that good thats why most people don't have it. IMO a lot of people with really big turbos would benifit from this system Harry Formerly yellowzxtt " If it doesn't make it faster, i don't care " Please visit www.ztuner.com to GO FASTER
Follow Ups	JWT Nitrous System Question - LUNZ 16:13:34 02/15/06 a quick question about this.... - joker_20_02 (Rebuilding) 16:25:29 02/15/06 There is a program added to the ECU, it uses the injectors - mpbond(STL) 16:37:20 02/15/06 i already have a wet shot, but i was wondering if they - joker_20_02 (Rebuilding) 16:40:33 02/15/06 I'm sure JWT could change the program to make it not use - mpbond(STL) 16:44:17 02/15/06 I have it on my JWT ecu. It works above 2000 rpm and - AzHeat 18:00:29 02/15/06 what turbos? I am planning on getting N2O eventually - mpbond(STL) 18:30:39 02/15/06 You can use the AEM which has programmable outputs (n/m) - AzHeat 18:01:44 02/15/06 2nd , wet shot is way safer - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 18:42:17 02/15/06 >>> - ztunerz 18:03:37 02/15/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.